source: official regulator registers

Finst

EU · MiCA Authorised

Is this your listing? Claim it

Licensing: Genuine licence held (the EU/EEA (MiCA))

Audit & reserves: Not yet researched

Finst holds a genuine crypto-specific licence covering the EU/EEA (MiCA). It first appears in our register on 2025-07-24 and is currently tracked across 30 jurisdictions through 1 legal entity.

Countries covered (30)

Get an email if Finst's status changes

Finst B.V

Regulator
Netherlands Authority for the Financial Markets (AFM)
Home state
NL — Netherlands
LEI
724500UI8UD7HKGVJX65
Registered office
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Entity registered
2022-03-01
Authorised
2025-07-24
Services
Custody and administration of crypto-assets · Execution of orders · Reception and transmission of orders · Transfer services
Passported to
AT · BE · BG · CY · CZ · DE · DK · EE · ES · FI · FR · GR · HR · HU · IE · IS · IT · LI · LT · LU · LV · MT · NL · NO · PL · PT · RO · SE · SI · SK

What others report

Third-party ratings, not verified by us — each figure links to its original source. Kept separate from the regulator-sourced facts above and the first-party user reports below.

No third-party rating data collected yet for Finst.

User reports

Community-sourced and reviewed before publication. Kept strictly separate from the regulator-sourced data above.

Loading reports…

Do you use Finst from your country? Report your experience

Is Finst the best crypto exchange for you?

There's no such thing as the best crypto exchange in absolute terms — only the best fit for a given person's situation. The right choice for a business that needs a clean, auditable compliance trail is rarely the right choice for an individual just holding a small amount long-term, and both are different again from someone trading derivatives professionally. We don't recommend Finst, or anyone else — we give you what's independently verifiable so you can make that call yourself.

Here's what we've actually verified about Finst, specifically:

None of this tells you whether Finst is right for you — that depends on what you're trying to do, which jurisdiction you're in, your own risk tolerance, and practical details this register doesn't track (fees, product range, day-to-day UX). What it does give you is what's actually checkable, so you're deciding from facts rather than the exchange's own marketing.

Sources: ESMA interim MiCA register (CASPS.csv), retrieved 2026-08-31 — original file .